Friday 12 October 2012

Blogging Social Difference- Week 2: The Big Blue Bus (Updated 12/9/12)

Taking the Big Blue Bus is an adventure, to say the least. More than anything, a trip on this particularly clean and efficient mode of public transportation serves more as an insight into the diverse personalities and dynamics of the city, as thousands use the system to navigate the crowded and varied landscape of the city. Being originally from a particularly affluent residential area, I did not have much opportunity, nor need, to use public transportation prior to college. It wasn't even so much of a not wanting to, or preferring not to, as not seeing reason to in a city that did not have a well developed public transportation system. Everyone back home just used cars, and didn't think otherwise. Here in Los Angeles, however, the public transportation system is part of how so many people can survive the chaos of their daily needs. Before travel on the Big Blue Bus actually takes place, one must navigate the incredible complexity of determining available and working bus stops. Depending on the day and time, a bus makes different stops and reaches different places, making finding the correct bus at the correct place more challenging than seemingly necessary. I started in Ackerman Turnaround, having seem a multitude of Big Blue Buses come through there in the past, and thus believing this to be the correct place to start. Let me tell you, it only takes about half hour before you realize that you are in the wrong place, and really don't know where to go next. Thankfully, the Big Blue Bus company posts corresponding times and stops for their buses, yet this still necessitates a knowledge of the surrounding area. This only proves that public transportation is generally made more for local people with previous knowledge of the area and system, not necessarily for travelers. That the public transportation system is predisposed towards those who live in the area and have knowledge of the area serves as a somewhat subconscious divider as it separates the knowledgeable from the unknowing, the resident from the traveler, and those with access to resources from those that do not. To get on the bus requires a fee, which makes sense, certainly, in context of the need of the public system to be able to afford this public service. Travel itself is not necessarily smooth, but is certainly efficient. The stops are pre-determined and frequent, so travel is made in conscious observation of your relation to your surroundings as you try to avoid missing the correct stop and losing valuable time.

It is interesting to note that the Big Blue Bus, which covers a smaller area, seems to focus more on short-distance transit, meaning that people use the bus to go relatively close in their next destination. This is unique when compared to the Metro lines and other systems, which focus on long distance travel,and thus have different clientele, as the Big Blue Bus necessarily caters more to locals with limited traveling opportunties. At twelve thirty on a Tuesday, the demographics of the bus mostly consisted of younger students and elderly travelers. This makes sense in context, as most people in between those age groups would be at work during that time of day. The people themselves that use public transit are incredibly interesting and diverse characters. I personally enjoy trying to understand the social, economic, and political histories of those around me through my interpretations of how they dress, act, etc. The people on this trip varied incredibly from clean cut students to older asian grandmothers, to teenage tattooed skateboarders. For no reason whatsoever would these people come together unless through the need to travel through public transportation to meet their social and economic responsibilties. While the travelers on the bus did not interact or talk to one another, they still followed the social etiquette and structure that is common to all of us, and which brings us closer together in our common residences.

In terms of the modern day city, The Big Blue Bus is a manifestation, if you will, of the social differences that arise in society from the agglomeration of people in cities. If we follow Durkheim's belief that the division of labor creates society by agglomerating people into one area to share resources and center around one common religious/political center, then Los Angeles serves as a prime example of such agglomeration. It is home to thousands of occupations, and thus brings together multitudes of different types of people. In this way, society is diversified. As society becomes more dense and populated over a large area, there comes a need for transportation services to allow people to maintain their occupations and lifestyles. Simultaneously, we see that society stratifies itself, lending to the creation of classes and different social levels. Those in the higher levels have access to resources and thus are able to meet the daily (transportation) needs of being in this society without problem; those in the lower socioeconomic levels do not have such resources, and thus the need for public transportation, such as the Big Blue Bus, comes about. Without these tools, which are essentially manifestations of the division of labor and its consequences, society would not be able to live in cooperative unity, as competition for resources (such as dwellings nearer to work, commerce, etc) would cause discontent and conflict between groups. Los Angeles would then, hypothetically, have broken into pieces as society broke into conflicting pieces until equilibrium was reached once again. It is important to note,however, that the Big Blue Bus is just one such manifestation of this social division. Every place within Los Angeles, as well, is dictated by these social divisions, and society as we know it hangs in a balance of the manifestations of these divisions and the reactions of everyday people as they interact with these manifestations.

2 comments:

  1. For this week's blog, I will be responding to Robyn Monroe's blog about traveling on the Big Blue Bus. Monroe's observations and argument were supported by our first reading on Durkheim's "The Causes [of the Division of Labor]." With the reading, Monroe argues that the bus is an example of "manifestation…of the social differences that arise in society from the agglomeration of people in cities."

    Monroe starts the blog with discussing her personal opinions and relations to taking the bus. She has never really taken the bus, because there was never really the need to, coming from a residential area. I can very much relate to this; I only took the bus a few times before coming to LA. I never had the need to and the only time I did was to have an adventure. And once again, I can agree that the public transportation system in my city was not that great either; it was not as efficient and was only available in certain areas that I did not need to go to. But ever since I moved to LA to go to school, taking the bus is very normal. Public transportation may not necessarily be fast, but it can get a person places; anywhere from Santa Monica to Downtown. Also, there are so many different types of transportation in LA: buses, subways, trains, Amtrak, etc., that are available in comparison to where I lived (and Monroe, too).

    Next, Monroe discusses her observations about the bus itself: from times and stops, fees, and the people that take the bus. She went on about the people whom she saw take the bus. I find this part of taking the bus VERY interesting. The age groups, the class, what they wear, etc. and then at what times these different groups come together to take the bus. Thankfully, Monroe noticed this and discusses how she saw older people and students during working hours. This makes perfect sense because a lot of the working people take the bus to and from work and therefore would not be on the bus. From experience, during the early mornings and rush hour, there are various groups of people who come to take the bus. It is very interesting; you can see anyone from a cleaning lady to a business(wo)man to a homeless person.

    Then, Monroe relates her observations to how her observations relate to Durkheim. She explores Durkeim's argument that the "division of labor creates society by agglomerating people into one area to share resource and center around one common religious/political area" to support her argument that Los Angeles is the example of this agglomeration and that the Big Blue Bus is a manifestation of the social differences that "arise from the agglomeration of people in cities." I think that Monroe really hits it on the nail! Not only did she use and understand Durkheim's argument from the reading, but she related it so well to her discussion of the Big Blue Bus. She argues that the bus is a huge example of the social division in Los Angeles. Overall, Monroe was able to understand the reading and develop an idea in relationship to Los Angeles and the Big Blue Bus.

    However, I did wish that she could have developed her idea in relation to those who take the bus that come from a higher-class, but then again I personally do not know where she took the bus to and if she was able to see other groups of people from different classes/genders/work. Also, I wish that she could have put more pictures so I could have seen everything she was talking about!! But I had a great time reading it and could very much relate to everything that was talked about. Great post :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Robyn,
    First, I really enjoyed your post about your recent excursion via "The Big Blue Bus." I especially enjoyed how you chose to specifically analyze your experience on the Santa Monica bus system itself rather than simply using the bus as a means to bring you to wherever you were traveling. You noted that the bus system seems to be organized with the local (and knowledgable) traveler in mind. I too have struggled with finding the correct bus at the correct stop at the correct time. It's only been after multiple bus trips at UCLA that I have finally begun to grasp how the local bus systems operate. This can definitely prove to be a disadvantage for those who may not be local residents. Whenever I travel abroad, I am always so impressed at the easy and clarity of public transportation systems in other large metropolitan areas. It confuses me why it is easier to navigate a transportation system in a city like Barcelona versus Los Angeles where I not only live but am also a native speaker of the English language. I definitely feel like Los Angeles, despite it's comprehensive transportation system still has a long way to go before it can truly serve the needs of both local residents and non-residents.

    I also found your analysis on the locality of the Santa Monica Blue Bus versus the regional nature of the LA Metro interesting to think about. I definitely think there is a significant dynamic surrounding the fact that Santa Monica implements its own transportation network in addition to the Metro service routes that also service Santa Monica. In general, I've noticed that the Blue Bus seems to be more reliable than my experiences with the Metro. I think this is probably because like you said, The Blue Bus services a smaller area which means it can offer more concentrated and thus in theory more reliable transportion services to travelers who only wish to travel relatively short distances.

    Your analysis on the social differences present on the Blue Bus definitely helps paint a picture of urban social difference on a larger scale. I too enjoy riding the bus because I feel like I become part of a larger social organism. This organism is comprised of people who I would probably never be in the same space were it not for public transportation. I also thought of the Durkheim reading while reading your blog post. I was thinking about how Durkheim explained that the division of labor allows for such social differences to exist in one concentrated area like Santa Monica or Los Angeles. Durkheim writes, "It seems clear, in this case at least, that the individuals who share the work do not belong to the same society. But we should remember that a group, whilst it retains its individuality, can be enveloped within another larger one, which comprises others of the same kind." I think this definitely relates to your comments on the social differences present on the bus because even though it may seem like those individuals are fundamentally different, they still share a larger core identity and that is the shared identity of the urban environment.

    Great post!

    ReplyDelete